Difference between revisions of "North South Exchange Consortium"
(→Newry launch) |
m |
||
(77 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == | + | ==[[NSEC E-Consultation Context|Context]]== |
− | + | The political changes in Northern Ireland have led to increased cooperation between the north and south of the island, particularly between education bodies. | |
− | + | ||
+ | The complexity of cooperation has required greater management, a task given to the [http://www.nsec.info North South Exchange Consortium (NSEC)] by the the [http://www.deni.gov.uk/ Department of Education (Northern Ireland)] and the [http:///www.education.ie Department of Education and Science (Ireland)]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A key element of the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] work plan is to develop and maintain lines of communication. [http://www.nsec.info NSEC], therefore, turned to e-technology. [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] believed the technology would: | ||
+ | #Increase their capacity to run consultation initiatives. | ||
+ | #Facilitate consultations with large stakeholder groups. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==[[NSEC E-Consultation Process and Planning|Process and Planning]]== | ||
+ | In collaboration with the [http://www.e-consultation.org research team], [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] set out to develop an e-consultation framework that could mirror the complexity of [http://www.nsec.info NSEC's] consultation objectives. The framework had to be capable of underpinning different levels of engagement with a diverse number of stakeholders. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Stakeholders would most likely be: | ||
+ | *programme coordinators | ||
+ | *educational managers | ||
+ | *school teachers | ||
+ | *school children | ||
+ | The stakeholder sample was split between ''participants and non-participants'' of the North South exchange programmes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Two key issues arose for [http://www.nsec.info NSEC]: | ||
+ | # Need for a clear understanding of the consultation aims | ||
+ | # Need for a clear understanding of the potential of available technologies | ||
+ | |||
+ | A planning process began, which addressed [http://www.nsec.info NSEC's] issues. From the planning process, five objectives were agreed: | ||
+ | #To obtain stakeholders’ views on themes and criteria of the Single Programme Framework (SPF). | ||
+ | #To evaluate exchange programmes and devise ways of optimising the benefits gained. | ||
+ | #To gather input for policy development. | ||
+ | #To capture the attitudes and expectations of stakeholders. | ||
+ | #To identify best practice. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==[[NSEC E-consultation Design|E-consultation Design]]== | ||
+ | [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] held several meetings and decided to run a consultation that incorporated ''both'' conventional consultation techniques and e-consultation elements. This allowed all channels of communication to be exploited. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====[[NSEC E-consultation Design#E-consultation for the NSEC launch event|E-consultation for the NSEC launch event]]==== | ||
+ | On the day, [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] [[NSEC E-consultation Design#NSEC Launch Event|launched]] (to an audience of educationalists, from a range of stakeholders across Ireland) their [http://www.nsec.info/ web site], which included downloadable [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm research reports]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first stages of the e-consultation were launched at the same time: | ||
+ | # A short e-voting session during the presentations (The [http://www.e-consultation.org research team] helped to designed a set of questions for the [[NSEC E-consultation Design#NSEC Launch Event|launch meeting]]). | ||
+ | # The possibility to sign up to an e-newsletter. | ||
+ | # [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] delivered, and participants completed, a short [http://consultation.nsec.info/survey/index.php?sid=4&newtest=Y on-line questionnaire]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The [http://www.e-consultation.org research team] designed the [http://nsec.e-consultation.org/wiki/index.php/Welcome consultation web site], online questionnaires and recommended suitable technologies for engaging more participant groups. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====[[NSEC E-consultation Design#Post-launch e-consultation design|Post-launch e-consultation design]]==== | ||
+ | Participants who attended the launch were consulted. However, [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] needed to consult a wider group. These involved: | ||
+ | *Organisations involved in educational exchanges | ||
+ | *Young people | ||
+ | [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] also received technical help from the [http://www.e-consultation.org research team] to deliver online questionnaires and other systems for managing large quantities of data from consultations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==[[Participant Experiences]]== | ||
+ | 11 types of participant were identified for the purposes of running the e-consultation trial. These groups ranged from Funding Agencies, individuals such as teachers, to Youth Groups. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Appreciating the complexity of e-consultation (especially in a constantly changing political environment) [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] adopted a multi-stranded plan. Such a plan meant that, each target group involved had to be researched in relation to their experiences with the technology and the best way in which they could be accessed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Regardless, unforeseen technical issues meant that access became a problem, especially for schools and their students. [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] changed the technology, which permitted the consultation web sites to be accessed by all. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The consultation also experienced a slow start. Very few people signed up to the e-newsletter or took part in the initial survey. Only when [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] sent out surveys to more people did responses begin to increase. The launch event saw the most interest in the consultation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] [http://www.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php/Participant_Experiences claimed] to be particularly satisfied with the [http://e-consultation.org research team’s] work, and planned to use the web site and software, which the [http://e-consultation.org research team] designed for them. Although this software was free, the cost of attending to the software is not. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==[[NSEC Consultation Data Generated|Consultation data generated]]== | ||
+ | Although the [http://e-consultation.org research team] cannot present too many findings (due to the consultation's slow start), the case presents another illustration of running an e-consultation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example, although the generated on-line survey data was low, analysis of web traffic indicated that there was increased activity on the [http://www.nsec.info/ NSEC web page]. People were using the site to [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm download reports and files], but not completing the survey. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==[[NSEC Learning Outcomes|Learning Outcomes]]== | ||
+ | Reflecting on the consultation, it is evident that progress was affected by: | ||
+ | #[[NSEC Learning Outcomes#1. Resources|Resource issues]]: recruitment to the trials and focus groups were not fully anticipated at the outset of the trials. | ||
+ | #[[NSEC Learning Outcomes#2. Political considerations|Political considerations]]: With the Northern Ireland political processes frozen, activity from [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] might have been seen to be inappropriately creating a new north-south body with no [http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/ Northern Ireland Assembly] to report to | ||
+ | #[[NSEC Learning Outcomes#3. Calender considerations|Calender considerations]] were ignored, meaning that at certain times consultees were busy or not interested. | ||
+ | #[[NSEC Learning Outcomes#4. Complexity|Consultation environment complexity]]: it became increasingly obvious that to engage with some of these consultees would require specialist strategies. | ||
+ | #[[NSEC Learning Outcomes#4. Complexity|Must clearly identify each group of consultees]]: to determine resources and requirements accurately. | ||
+ | #[[NSEC Learning Outcomes#6. E-consultation role in communications strategy|E-consultation's role in developing an integrated communications strategy]], which then needs to be integrated into the overall communications strategy of the organisation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==[[NSEC Future work programme|Future work programme]]== | ||
+ | As a result in the latter stages of the e-consultation project a future work programme was agreed, as follows: | ||
+ | #The [http://www.e-consultation.org e-consultation research team] are to brief the new [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] team members in July 2006. | ||
+ | #The [http://www.e-consultation.org (research team-designed)] consultation web sites will be transferred to the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] site in July 2006. | ||
+ | #The e-consultation exercise, involving school children and young people who have participated in exchange programmes, is to be initiated in September 2006. | ||
+ | #E-enable focus groups are to be initiated in January 2007. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==[[NSEC Conclusion|Conclusion]]== | ||
+ | The initial trial with the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] clearly identified some issues: | ||
+ | # Technological, personnel and financial resources. You cannot fully automate a consultation - people still need to manage and run it. | ||
+ | # As has been identified in other trials ([[Waterways Ireland]] and [[The Wheel]]), the technology proved easier than anticipated but the process more complex than expected. | ||
+ | # The complexity of the consultation domain means there was a need for extensive pre-consultation research. | ||
+ | # Technical issues arose due to the increasing levels of nuisance e-mails and spam, which negatively affected web site usage. |
Latest revision as of 16:25, 21 September 2007
Contents
Context
The political changes in Northern Ireland have led to increased cooperation between the north and south of the island, particularly between education bodies.
The complexity of cooperation has required greater management, a task given to the North South Exchange Consortium (NSEC) by the the Department of Education (Northern Ireland) and the Department of Education and Science (Ireland).
A key element of the NSEC work plan is to develop and maintain lines of communication. NSEC, therefore, turned to e-technology. NSEC believed the technology would:
- Increase their capacity to run consultation initiatives.
- Facilitate consultations with large stakeholder groups.
Process and Planning
In collaboration with the research team, NSEC set out to develop an e-consultation framework that could mirror the complexity of NSEC's consultation objectives. The framework had to be capable of underpinning different levels of engagement with a diverse number of stakeholders.
Stakeholders would most likely be:
- programme coordinators
- educational managers
- school teachers
- school children
The stakeholder sample was split between participants and non-participants of the North South exchange programmes.
Two key issues arose for NSEC:
- Need for a clear understanding of the consultation aims
- Need for a clear understanding of the potential of available technologies
A planning process began, which addressed NSEC's issues. From the planning process, five objectives were agreed:
- To obtain stakeholders’ views on themes and criteria of the Single Programme Framework (SPF).
- To evaluate exchange programmes and devise ways of optimising the benefits gained.
- To gather input for policy development.
- To capture the attitudes and expectations of stakeholders.
- To identify best practice.
E-consultation Design
NSEC held several meetings and decided to run a consultation that incorporated both conventional consultation techniques and e-consultation elements. This allowed all channels of communication to be exploited.
E-consultation for the NSEC launch event
On the day, NSEC launched (to an audience of educationalists, from a range of stakeholders across Ireland) their web site, which included downloadable research reports.
The first stages of the e-consultation were launched at the same time:
- A short e-voting session during the presentations (The research team helped to designed a set of questions for the launch meeting).
- The possibility to sign up to an e-newsletter.
- NSEC delivered, and participants completed, a short on-line questionnaire.
The research team designed the consultation web site, online questionnaires and recommended suitable technologies for engaging more participant groups.
Post-launch e-consultation design
Participants who attended the launch were consulted. However, NSEC needed to consult a wider group. These involved:
- Organisations involved in educational exchanges
- Young people
NSEC also received technical help from the research team to deliver online questionnaires and other systems for managing large quantities of data from consultations.
Participant Experiences
11 types of participant were identified for the purposes of running the e-consultation trial. These groups ranged from Funding Agencies, individuals such as teachers, to Youth Groups.
Appreciating the complexity of e-consultation (especially in a constantly changing political environment) NSEC adopted a multi-stranded plan. Such a plan meant that, each target group involved had to be researched in relation to their experiences with the technology and the best way in which they could be accessed.
Regardless, unforeseen technical issues meant that access became a problem, especially for schools and their students. NSEC changed the technology, which permitted the consultation web sites to be accessed by all.
The consultation also experienced a slow start. Very few people signed up to the e-newsletter or took part in the initial survey. Only when NSEC sent out surveys to more people did responses begin to increase. The launch event saw the most interest in the consultation.
NSEC claimed to be particularly satisfied with the research team’s work, and planned to use the web site and software, which the research team designed for them. Although this software was free, the cost of attending to the software is not.
Consultation data generated
Although the research team cannot present too many findings (due to the consultation's slow start), the case presents another illustration of running an e-consultation.
For example, although the generated on-line survey data was low, analysis of web traffic indicated that there was increased activity on the NSEC web page. People were using the site to download reports and files, but not completing the survey.
Learning Outcomes
Reflecting on the consultation, it is evident that progress was affected by:
- Resource issues: recruitment to the trials and focus groups were not fully anticipated at the outset of the trials.
- Political considerations: With the Northern Ireland political processes frozen, activity from NSEC might have been seen to be inappropriately creating a new north-south body with no Northern Ireland Assembly to report to
- Calender considerations were ignored, meaning that at certain times consultees were busy or not interested.
- Consultation environment complexity: it became increasingly obvious that to engage with some of these consultees would require specialist strategies.
- Must clearly identify each group of consultees: to determine resources and requirements accurately.
- E-consultation's role in developing an integrated communications strategy, which then needs to be integrated into the overall communications strategy of the organisation.
Future work programme
As a result in the latter stages of the e-consultation project a future work programme was agreed, as follows:
- The e-consultation research team are to brief the new NSEC team members in July 2006.
- The (research team-designed) consultation web sites will be transferred to the NSEC site in July 2006.
- The e-consultation exercise, involving school children and young people who have participated in exchange programmes, is to be initiated in September 2006.
- E-enable focus groups are to be initiated in January 2007.
Conclusion
The initial trial with the NSEC clearly identified some issues:
- Technological, personnel and financial resources. You cannot fully automate a consultation - people still need to manage and run it.
- As has been identified in other trials (Waterways Ireland and The Wheel), the technology proved easier than anticipated but the process more complex than expected.
- The complexity of the consultation domain means there was a need for extensive pre-consultation research.
- Technical issues arose due to the increasing levels of nuisance e-mails and spam, which negatively affected web site usage.